Page 218 - Demo
P. 218
Beyond paper:Electronic bills of lading and the limits of blockchainFor generations, the industry has depended on paper-based processes to transfer rights to possession, release cargo, and evidence contractual rights. That model is now being challenged by digitalisation. Electronic bills of lading are becoming more widely accepted, and blockchain has emerged as a technology to make them more secure, reliable, and efficient.The starting point is the bill of lading itself. In its classic form, it performs three functions: it acts as a receipt for the goods, as evidence of the contract of carriage, and, where it operates as a document of title, as a means of transferring constructive possession and the right to delivery while the goods are in transit. That final function gives the bill its commercial power: it allows the document to stand in for the goods while they are in transit and to be endorsed, traded, financed, and relied upon by banks and third parties. Any serious electronic alternative must therefore do more than digitise information; it must reproduce the bill%u2019s legal and commercial effect, especially its document-of-title function.The paper bill, however, is costly, slow, and vulnerable. A late-1990s UN study estimated the global cost of processing trade paperwork at approximately USD 420 billion annually, while more recent reports have indicated that paper documentation can account for up to onefifth of transport costs and that the bill of lading itself may account for 10%u201330% of total documentation costs. So long as the physical document remains the %u201ckey to the warehouse%u201d, these costs remain embedded in the system. Paper also slows trade: vessels often arrive before the original bill, causing delay, storage costs, demurrage, and reliance on letters of indemnity, which remain commercially familiar but legally risky. Paper systems also carry security risks, including forged or switched bills, human error, confusion caused by multiple originals, and delivery without surrender of the original bill. Depending on the jurisdiction, the consequences can be severe: for instance, under UK law, delivery against a forged bill is treated as misdelivery, with no defence based on good faith or innocence.An article by John Agapitos LLB, LLM, MScSolicitor and Lawyerat Agapitos, Georgiou and PartnersShipping is undergoing a structural shift in the way trade documentation is created, transferred, and relied upon. Smart shipping214 NX

