Page 187 - Demo
P. 187
tical value. When an issue is identified, whether it is a reporting gap, a sensor inconsistency, or genuine performance deterioration, the response is targeted: operational adjustments (speed management, trim practice, voyage-planning discipline, port efficiency) or technical follow-up (maintenance prioritisation, calibration checks, investigation of primary consumers%u2019 consumption).Predictive elements add value when they improve prioritisation and timing. Trend-based alerts can highlight emerging patterns such as a gradual shift in the power-to-speed relationship, abnormal auxiliary-consumption behaviour, or recurring operational profiles associated with inefficiency. Earlier visibility supports earlier intervention, where most of the emissions benefits lie.Equally important, we avoid overstating precision. Shipping operations are influenced by weather, routing, draft, and port constraints, so robust outcomes depend on transparent assumptions, comparable-condition filtering, and a clear link from analytics to actions that crews and superintendents can realistically implement.How is the role of seafarers and shorebased teams evolving with the introduction of AI, remote operations, and smart vessels?Shipping has always relied on the professionalism and judgement of its people. The introduction of AI and smart-vessel technologies is helping seafarers and shore-based teams uphold safety standards with greater consistency, while also improving efficiency and reinforcing best practices in daily execution.On board, intelligent systems enhance everyday safety by improving visibility into navigation, machinery, and compliance parameters. Clear operational insight helps officers maintain safe boundaries and identify small deviations at an early stage. Acting before minor variations escalate preserves safety margins, supports stable watchkeeping, and promotes disciplined engine operation. When risks are observed earlier, decisions are calmer, more structured, and better documented.Immediate access to procedures, historical guidance, and technical knowledge further strengthens execution. Crews can apply company standards consistently across shifts and voyages, reducing variability and avoiding repetitive clarification. This structured approach not only protects safety but also improves efficiency, as operations remain controlled and predictable.The same applies ashore. Greater transparency enables shore teams to support vessels proactively rather than reactively. Communication becomes more focused and efficient, reducing back-and-forth exchanges and strengthening coordination. Structured information flow allows earlier risk identification and more effective collaboration between ship and shore, reinforcing high safety standards and consistent operational practices.Are charterers and cargo owners advocating data transparency and digital performance reporting strongly enough? Demand for transparency is clearly growing, but the level of advocacy varies across counterparties and trades. Many charterers and cargo interests now request emissions-related information and performance reporting, particularly when they face their own disclosure requirements and stakeholder expectations. However, the industry has not yet reached a shared view of what %u201cgood transparency%u201d looks like in practice, particularly regarding common definitions, verification approaches, and consistent expectations for data structure, quality, and comparability.Shipping has always relied on the professionalismand judgement of its people.The introduction of AI and smart-vesseltechnologies is helping seafarers and shore-basedteams uphold safety standards with greaterconsistency, while also improving efficiency and reinforcing best practices in daily execution.May 2026 183

