Page 105 - ΝΑΥΤΙΚΑ ΧΡΟΝΙΚΑ - ΜΑΙΟΣ 2023
P. 105

fuels. It may be suitable for small vessels on relatively short distances. But for
                          large ships, the “hydrogen carriers” methanol and ammonia are easier to handle
                          and have a higher energy density.
                 Ammonia: It is produced from hydrogen by adding nitrogen but needs only -34° C to remain
                          liquid, so it is easier than hydrogen to store. It does not emit any carbon when
                          burnt but releases a lot of NOx. In engines, it requires pilot fuel, whereas such
                          engines are still in development. Among its negatives is that the infrastructure
                          for using ammonia as marine fuel does not exist. However, its biggest deterrent is
                          its toxicity. Only a 0.5% air concentration kills a human instantly, whereas a tank
                          spill at sea will decimate a few cubic kilometres of any sea life.
                Methanol: Among its negatives is the fact that it is hard to make green methanol since  CO₂
                          must be added to green hydrogen. The sourcing of  CO₂ and the cost of the
                          process is a challenge. Other than that, the positives outweigh the negatives. It
                          is easy to use even on existing ships using the existing bunkering infrastructure
                          since it is liquid at ambient conditions and is harmless to the marine environment.
                  Biofuels: They can easily be used as drop-in fuels to conventional marine fuels. Thus, they
                          will be the first and easiest method to reduce emissions in the near future and
                          to comply with some upcoming regulations, like Fuel-EU, which require a gradual
                          reduction of the carbon content of ships’ fuel. A challenge will be their proper
                          certification and ensuring their production does not compete with food sources.
                          So, we see that the members’ choices have properly ranked each fuel primarily
                          based on its practicality and technological readiness.

             Considering that we are talking about green fuels, how is the issue complicated by the need
             for green hydrogen to produce green ammonia and
             green methanol?
                          98% of current hydrogen production is
                          from natural gas or even coal! Only 2%
                          is from water electrolysis, and even a
                          smaller amount, perhaps 1%, is really
                          green, where the electricity used is
                          from renewable sources (wind or solar).
                          Indeed, for ammonia and methanol to
                          be green, they need to be produced
                          from green hydrogen. And here lies
                          the challenge. The current and future
                          projected renewable electricity is insuf-
                          ficient to produce the enormous quan-
                          tities of green hydrogen required by
                          shipping. Not only that, but a recent
                          study submitted to IMO shows that
                          even if, theoretically, those quantities
                          were produced, the CO₂ reduction by
                          supplying them to other industries
                          (such as land transportation and facto-
                          ries) would be 8 times larger than sup-
                          plying them to ships. So, the question
                          is, even if green hydrogen was avail-
                          able, would any be left for ships? Here
                          nuclear energy could help to produce
                          the green hydrogen required. But in the
                          end, we need new technology, such as
                          better batteries and cheaper and faster
                          methods to produce green fuels.
                                                                                                            105
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110