Page 172 - Demo

How is the role of seafarers and shorebased teams evolving with the introduction of AI, remote operations, and smart vessels?The role of seafarers is undergoing a significant transformation. What was once largely based on manual, hands-on operations is now shifting toward responsibilities that rely on remote monitoring, decision-making, and the management of increasingly complex digital systems. This shift demands a very different skill set, one that is far more cognitive, technical, and systems-oriented than before.At the same time, shore-based teams are taking on a much more active and influential role. They are no longer just providing support; they are becoming central to supervision and decision-making processes, often relying on AI technologies to optimise vessel performance and maintenance. This highlights that the transformation is not purely technological; it is human-centred. It requires not only new tools but also new ways of working, new organisational structures, and updated regulatory frameworks to ensure operations remain safe, efficient, and sustainable. Both seafarers and shore-based personnel are now expected to adapt continuously. Continuous learning is no longer optional; it is an ongoing requirement.This transition is not without its challenges. Issues such as cybersecurity, human factors, and increasing mental workload are becoming more prominent and are still not being addressed as thoroughly as they should be. There is a clear need for training systems and regulations to evolve in step with these changes.From my perspective, one of the biggest gaps lies in our understanding of human factors in remote operations. Areas such as mental health, fatigue, and ergonomic design are critical yet remain comparatively under-researched. Risks, including loss of expertise, boredom, and mental overload, could significantly affect safety and efficiency if left unaddressed. Therefore, stronger integration between shipboard and shore-based teams is essential, as multi-functional teams and better digital platforms could substantially improve coordination and communication, which are becoming increasingly complex in this new operating environment.On the regulatory side, existing frameworks are inadequate to meet the demands of AI-enabled and remote operations. There is a real need for updated regulations, especially in areas such as watchkeeping and fatigue management, to reflect this new reality.I find hybrid training approaches particularly promising. Combining simulation-based learning with real-time remote operations could help bridge the gap between onboard experience and shore-based oversight. This kind of training can play a key role in improving situational awareness, strengthening human-machine coordination, and enabling faster, more effective decision-making, especially in critical situations.Are charterers and cargo owners advocating data transparency and digital performance reporting strongly enough?Charterers and cargo owners are increasingly pushing for greater data transparency and more advanced digital performance reporting, driven by both regulatory requirements and day-to-day operational needs. We are seeing a steady shift toward digital record-keeping, real-time data access, and the integration of digital platforms for operational and environmental reporting.Regulatory, commercial, and sustainability pressures are all contributing to a growing demand for real-time data sharing, greater operational visibility, and increased environmental accountability. As a result, we see digital transformation gradually reshaping traditional shipping practices and opening the door to new ways of working with our charterers and ensuring compliance.While many challenges remain, it is clear that technological progress and regulatory developments are advancing, particularly in the tanker segment, where stakeholders are already calling for uniform, scalable, and flexible systems. The bulk carrier segment is gradually moving in the same direction.The demand for real-time data is highest where commercial and regulatory pressures align. In these cases, digital platforms play a key role in closing data gaps and enabling more consistent, efficient information-sharing.From my perspective, several elements are key enablers to the digital transition: strong leadership, the right organisational culture, proper training, clear regulatory incentives, and effective collaboration through digital platforms. Existing regulatory frameworks such as IMO EEDI, SEEMP, EEXI, and CII, along with financial incentives, are already proving effective in encouraging wider adoption of digital reporting.Overall, the direction is clear: the maritime industry is moving toward greater transparency and more robust digital performance reporting. But we see that the strength of this move varies across regions and sectors. In areas with more developed digital infrastructure and stricter regulations, such as Europe and the Americas, expectations around transparency and the pace of digital adoption tend to be higher. Has cyber risk become a serious threat to fleet safety and business continuity as ships become increasingly connected and software-driven? To what extent is the industry truly prepared to protect itself against these threats?Undoubtedly, it is a serious threat. Ships' increasing connectivity has expanded their exposure to cyber risks. What was once a relatively contained operational environment is now far more open, making unauthorised access, data breaches, and system disruptions not only possible but increasingly probable. These threats are no longer abstract; they have very real implications for fleet safety and business continuity, with the potential for serious operational and financial consequences if not properly addressed.As more onboard systems become interconnected, the overall attack surSmart shipping168 NX