Page 198 - ΝΑΥΤΙΚΑ ΧΡΟΝΙΚΑ - ΟΚΤΩΒΡΙΟΣ 2024
P. 198

ΗΟRIZON FROM THE BRIDGE


                        Transparency and Comparability: The ESRS aims   global trade association for shipowners representing
                               to ensure that companies provide stan-  over 80% of the world merchant fleet, has launched
                               dardised and comparable ESG informa-  its Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) Data Collection
                               tion, allowing stakeholders to evaluate   System.
                               their performance more easily.       The CII is a rating system developed by the Inter-
                        Incorporating ESG considerations and complying   national Maritime Organisation (IMO) to measure
                        with the CSRD and the ESRS can present chal-  the energy efficiency of ships over 5,000 gross ton-
                        lenges, especially for companies unfamiliar with   nage that trade internationally. It came into effect
                        sustainability reporting. However, the benefits far   on 1 January 2023 and is currently in an experi-
                        outweigh the costs for the following reasons:  ence-building phase, with a formal review running
                        Improved Access to Capital: Investors are increas-  in parallel until 1 January 2026. During this period,
                               ingly factoring ESG criteria into  their   the IMO has invited interested Member States and
                               investment decisions. Companies with   international organisations to collect data and sub-
                               strong ESG performance and transparent   mit information and proposals for improvements
                               reporting are more likely to attract invest-  to the CII system. The ICS wishes to engage con-
                               ment, especially from socially responsible   structively with this process and invites ship owners
                               and institutional investors.         and ship managers to submit data via forms for the
                        Risk Management: Companies with robust ESG   reporting period.
                               practices are better equipped to antici-  The International Association of Dry Cargo Ship-
                               pate and mitigate risks related to climate   owners (INTERCARGO) has submitted proposals to
                               change, regulatory shifts, supply chain   the IMO, calling for a review of the CII at the 82nd
                               disruptions, and reputational damage.  session of the Marine Environment Protection Com-
                        Regulatory Compliance: With the introduction of   mittee (MEPC 82), held between 30 September and
                               the CSRD and the ESRS, non-compliance   4 October at the IMO Headquarters in London.
                               is not an option. Companies that do not   Drawing on extensive studies that analysed data
                               meet the reporting requirements could   from over 5,600 bulk carriers, conducted in col-
                               face legal and financial penalties.  laboration with three major classification societies
                        Brand and Reputation: Consumers and stakehold-  – ABS, Bureau Veritas, and DNV – INTERCARGO
                               ers are more inclined to support busi-  has highlighted several fundamental issues with
                               nesses that align with ethical and sustain-  the current CII system:
                               able practices. Transparent ESG reporting   Impact of idle time: The studies show a clear cor-
                               can build trust and enhance brand loyalty.  relation between increased idle time and
                        Long-Term Value Creation: A focus on ESG is        poorer CII ratings, particularly for smaller
                               increasingly seen as synonymous with        vessel sizes. This idle time, which includes
                               long-term value creation. Companies that    periods in port or at anchorage, is often
                               address environmental and social chal-      beyond the vessel's control.
                               lenges are more likely to thrive in a rapidly   Perverse incentives: The current CII framework may
                               changing business environment.              inadvertently encourage ships to run their
                        ESG is no longer a “nice-to-have” component        main engines unnecessarily – for example
                        of modern business strategy, but a critical one.   when waiting at anchorage – potentially
                        Many shipping companies are still unaware that     increasing overall emissions while improv-
                        they are part of the approximately 49,000 EU       ing their CII rating.
                        companies that will have to comply with these new   Inconsistent efficiency indicators: Vessels with
                        regulations in the near future. The system will be   E ratings often have lower average CO2
                        deployed in four phases, starting in January 2024   emissions compared to those rated A to D,
                        for companies already reporting under the Non-Fi-  suggesting that the CII does not accurately
                        nancial Reporting Directive (NFRD), before being   reflect a vessel's true efficiency.
                        expanded to large companies the following year,   Size-based disparities: Smaller bulk carriers, espe-
                        listed SMEs from 2026, and certain non-European    cially in the Handysize and Supramax/
                        entities two years later.                          Ultramax segments, show a higher per-
                        The future of business lies in its ability to balance   centage of D and E ratings compared to
                        profit with purpose, and ESG provides the frame-   larger vessels.
                        work to do just that.                       In light of these findings, INTERCARGO has pro-
                                                                    posed that the IMO:
                        INTERCARGO PROPOSES REVIEW OF THE           •   Review and adjust the CII to better reflect a
                        CURRENT CII                                    vessel's true energy efficiency, rather than, by
                        The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), the   implication, reflecting the efficiency of a port


         198
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203